Private by design
Only assigned members of Hackrate’s internal security team perform the assessment. Scope, credentials, evidence, and findings are never shared with Hackrate’s ethical hacker community.
Traditional penetration testing
Assess agreed applications and infrastructure through a confidential, time-bound engagement led by senior Hackrate cybersecurity professionals. Choose a final PDF report or manage validated findings as they are identified through the Hackrate Ethical Hacking Platform.
Main benefits
Traditional penetration testing is designed for organizations that need a confidential delivery model and clear evidence of the work performed.
Only assigned members of Hackrate’s internal security team perform the assessment. Scope, credentials, evidence, and findings are never shared with Hackrate’s ethical hacker community.
Senior cybersecurity professionals combine structured assessment experience with the creative thinking needed to investigate business logic, edge cases, and chained attack paths.
Choose a final PDF report or review validated findings as they are identified in the Hackrate Ethical Hacking Platform, followed by a consolidated final report.
Controlled access
Sensitive systems, regulated environments, internal applications, and confidential product releases may require a particularly restricted delivery model. Testing is performed exclusively by the assigned Hackrate internal team, and no target or vulnerability information is distributed to the ethical hacker community.
Why Hackrate?
For web applications and web services, testing aligns with the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and is adapted to the architecture, risk profile, access level, and rules of engagement.
Experienced testers investigate business logic, privilege boundaries, unusual workflows, and combinations of weaknesses that automated tools may not understand.
At your request, HackGATE can monitor and log authorized pentester activity according to the agreed configuration, providing an additional evidence trail.
Every finding is reviewed for reproducibility, impact, and relevance so technical, management, and audit stakeholders can understand the risk and prioritize remediation.
HackGATE is optional. It does not replace the testing methodology, the pentester’s expertise, or the final assessment report.
A clear assessment workflow
Agree targets, business objectives, exclusions, access model, testing window, reporting requirements, and assurance context.
Confirm tester accounts, test data, escalation contacts, prohibited activities, stop procedures, reporting workflow, and optional HackGATE use.
The internal team performs manual and tool-assisted testing according to the approved scope, extending structured coverage with risk-based and creative testing.
Potential findings are reproduced and reviewed for technical validity, affected conditions, likely impact, and appropriate severity.
Platform customers receive validated findings during testing. PDF-only customers receive the consolidated report at the end, with urgent issues escalated securely.
Hackrate presents key results, risk themes, limitations, and recommended actions. Retesting is included where defined in the agreement.
Choose your reporting model
Both models include a final PDF report. The customer selects the delivery method before testing begins.
Hackrate consolidates validated findings into a final PDF report delivered at the end of the assessment. This suits customers that prefer an existing document-management process.
Critical findings can still be communicated through an agreed secure escalation channel.
Validated findings become available during the assessment, allowing the customer to review results without waiting for the final report.
Use the platform to centralize communication and monitor resolution status, with a consolidated PDF at the end.
Assessment output
Exact deliverables are defined in the statement of work. Depending on scope and delivery model, the assessment package can include:
A management-level view of the assessment, key risk themes, significant findings, and recommended priorities.
Tested targets, period, access model, methodology, exclusions, assumptions, and known limitations.
Technical description, affected components, evidence, reproduction information, impact, severity, and remediation guidance.
Areas and security controls assessed, plus the relevant limitations and conditions that affected testing.
Supporting activity logs or evidence when HackGATE is selected and configured for the engagement.
A documented review of agreed fixes where retesting is included in the statement of work.
Audit and assurance
A structured penetration test can support risk assessment, control-effectiveness review, vulnerability management, internal audit, and external assurance activities.
Hackrate reports can provide useful evidence for broader programs, but a penetration test report does not by itself establish certification or regulatory compliance.
These references describe supporting evidence only and do not imply certification or guaranteed compliance.
Choose the right model
Select a focused internal assessment, an invitation-only crowdsourced engagement, or a coordinated annual program.
| Traditional Pentest | Crowdsourced Pentest | Continuous Pentest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement model | One scoped assessment | One scoped, invitation-only assessment | Recurring 12-month program |
| Testing team | Hackrate internal team only | Selected Elite Ethical Hackers | Internal team, Elite Ethical Hackers, or a hybrid |
| Best suited for | Sensitive, restricted, or traditional assessment requirements | Creative testing with diverse attacker perspectives | Enterprise teams with multiple targets and recurring needs |
| Customer control | Customer approves scope and internal access | Customer approves scope and selected-hacker participation | Customer approves the model for every target |
| Results | PDF only or platform plus PDF | Hackrate platform and agreed reporting | Centralized platform results across the annual program |
| Planning | Project scoping before the assessment | Project scoping before the assessment | Annual roadmap and monthly prioritization |
| Explore | Explore Traditional Pentest | Explore Crowdsourced Pentest | Explore Continuous Pentest |
Frequently asked questions
Only assigned members of Hackrate’s internal cybersecurity team. Ethical hackers from the Hackrate community do not participate.
No. Scope, target information, credentials, evidence, and findings are not distributed to the community.
The methodology is adapted to the scope, architecture, access model, and business risks. Web applications and web services align with the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and are extended with manual, risk-based, and creative testing.
Yes. The final report is delivered at the end, while urgent findings can be escalated through an agreed secure communication channel.
Yes. When platform delivery is selected, validated findings can be made available during testing, followed by a final consolidated PDF.
No. HackGATE is completely optional and is used only when requested and approved by the customer.
No. It can support assurance, control testing, risk-management, and audit evidence within a broader compliance program.
Duration depends on target number and complexity, access model, test depth, and reporting requirements. Hackrate confirms the timeline after scoping.
Start with the right scope
Tell us what you need to assess, how access should be controlled, and how you would like to receive the findings.
Discuss Your Pentest ScopeOur platform helps companies to identify software vulnerabilities in a cost-efficient way. It provides a secure and centralized view of ethical hacking projects for your company.
US Patent Applied for HackGATE #63/645,845
May 29 • 13 min read
Jan 13 • 5 min read ★
Jan 05 • 4 min read